Is Aligntra Validated?
A straightforward answer for regulated industries
The Short Answer
Yes, with a shared responsibility model. Aligntra is built with validation controls aligned to GAMP 5 and FDA CSA guidance. We validate the software; you validate its use at your site. We provide documentation to support your qualification activities.
What Kind of Software Is Aligntra?
Aligntra is a quality system support tool that helps your team review documents for regulatory compliance. It's designed to assist qualified personnel—not replace them.
What Validation Controls Are Built In?
The Shared Responsibility Model
Like any SaaS platform in regulated industries, validation is a shared effort. Here's how responsibilities are divided:
◆ What We Do (Aligntra)
- ✓ Software development lifecycle controls
- ✓ Automated testing (227+ tests)
- ✓ AI output controls (hallucination detection)
- ✓ Evidence traceability to source documents
- ✓ Security controls and encryption
- ✓ Infrastructure and deployment validation
- ✓ Change management and release notes
- ✓ Validation documentation package
◆ What You Do (Your Organization)
- ✓ Determine intended use for your processes
- ✓ User Acceptance Testing (UAT)
- ✓ SOPs for how your team uses Aligntra
- ✓ User training on AI limitations
- ✓ Role assignments and access management
- ✓ Human review of all AI findings
- ✓ Record retention per your policies
- ✓ Final compliance determinations
Which Standards Does This Align With?
Our validation approach is designed to work across multiple regulated industries:
- GAMP 5 Second Edition (2022) — Including guidance for AI/ML and cloud systems
- FDA Computer Software Assurance (CSA) — Risk-based approach for production/QMS software
- ISO 13485 — Medical device quality management systems
- ISO 9001 — General quality management systems
- AS9100D — Aerospace quality management
- 21 CFR Part 11 — Electronic records (see note below)
The Human-in-the-Loop Design
Aligntra is intentionally designed so that AI assists but never decides. This is critical for validation:
- Every AI finding includes a source citation you can click to verify
- Confidence scores highlight where human attention is most needed
- You can accept, reject, or modify any finding before export
- Final compliance determinations are always made by your qualified personnel
This design significantly reduces the validation burden compared to autonomous decision-making systems. The AI is a sophisticated search and analysis tool—your experts make the calls.
Validation Documentation We Provide
What We're Transparent About
Honest validation requires honest disclosure:
- AI can miss things — False negatives are possible; AI supplements but doesn't replace expert review
- AI can flag incorrectly — False positives happen; that's why human review is required
- Confidence scores are estimates — They help prioritize review but aren't guarantees
- Document quality matters — Poorly formatted documents may yield lower-quality analysis
These limitations are why we designed a human-in-the-loop system with full evidence traceability. Every finding can be verified against the source.
Need Validation Documentation?
We're happy to provide our validation summary, Part 11 compliance matrix, and answer your security questionnaire.
Request Documentation →