ICH Q7 clause 3: Personnel

The 10 audit questions covering clause 3, each with the objective evidence to request, the nonconformities most often raised against it and what to sample. Part of the free ICH Q7 API GMP audit checklist, which holds 350 items across 18 clauses.

10 items in this clause 1 section 350 items in the full checklist ICH Q7 · updated 2026-06-22

All 10 questions for clause 3

Open any row for its objective evidence, common nonconformities and auditor tips. You can check items off as you go. This browser remembers your progress across all 18 clauses of this checklist.

§3 Personnel 10 items · ~50 min
3.10 Are there enough personnel with the education, training, and experience to perform their assigned GMP duties?
Objective evidence
  • Organization charts showing staffing levels
  • Job descriptions for all GMP roles
  • Qualification matrices (education + training + experience)
  • Personnel files with qualifications
  • Staffing vs workload assessment
  • Training records demonstrating competency
  • Succession planning documentation
  • Resource adequacy reviews
Common nonconformities
  • Understaffing leading to quality compromises
  • Job descriptions missing or outdated
  • Unqualified personnel performing GMP tasks
  • No succession planning for key roles
  • Qualification gaps not addressed
  • Overtime-driven fatigue impairing batch record accuracy
Auditor tip

Staffing must be sufficient for the workload with qualified personnel. Qualification criteria include: education (typically degrees relevant to the role), training (GMP and job-specific), experience (years in similar roles). Written responsibilities (job descriptions, responsibility matrices) prevent ambiguity about who does what. Under-staffing leads to shortcuts and quality failures.

3.11 Do personnel receive both GMP fundamentals training and job-specific training on the procedures and equipment they use?
Objective evidence
  • GMP training curriculum
  • Initial training program for new hires
  • Job-specific training records
  • Training matrices by role
  • Training effectiveness assessments (quizzes, observations)
  • Periodic refresher training records
  • Training conducted by qualified trainers
  • New employee verification before independent work
Common nonconformities
  • Training limited to attendance records without effectiveness assessment
  • New employees performing GMP work before training
  • No periodic refresher training
  • Training delivered by unqualified personnel
  • Job-specific training gaps
  • Training curriculum not updated after SOP revisions
Auditor tip

Two training dimensions: (1) GMP fundamentals (applicable to all employees performing GMP work) and (2) job-specific training on SOPs, techniques, and equipment relevant to the individual's role. Initial training before independent work is essential. Ongoing training keeps personnel current with procedure updates and emerging practices. Training effectiveness should be assessed, not just attendance recorded.

3.12 Are training records maintained for each employee, and is training effectiveness periodically assessed?
Objective evidence
  • Individual employee training files
  • Training matrix showing coverage by role
  • Effectiveness assessment scores
  • Competency observation records
  • Retraining records triggered by events
  • Training record retention per record retention policy
  • Periodic training file audits
  • Training database or LMS records
Common nonconformities
  • Training records incomplete or missing
  • No effectiveness assessment recorded
  • Competency not verified through observation
  • Retraining not performed after SOP changes
  • Training records destroyed before retention period
  • Electronic training system lacking audit trail for completions
Auditor tip

Training records are the regulatory evidence of employee competence. Each employee's file should contain dated training records with: course title, date, duration, trainer, and effectiveness assessment results. Periodic competency assessments (observations, tests, practical evaluations) verify retention. Retraining is triggered by procedure changes, performance issues, or scheduled cycles.

3.20 Are personnel expected to maintain good health and hygiene practices, with ill personnel excluded from production areas?
Objective evidence
  • Personnel hygiene SOP
  • Illness reporting procedures
  • Health screening at hire
  • Exclusion procedures for ill personnel
  • Wound/lesion reporting and handling
  • Supervisor training on health observation
  • Return-to-work clearance procedures
  • Health and hygiene training records
Common nonconformities
  • Ill personnel working in production areas
  • No procedure for reporting illness
  • Open wounds not properly covered or excluded
  • No supervisor training on health observation
  • Return to work without medical clearance
  • Hygiene monitoring absent during shift walkthroughs
Auditor tip

Personnel hygiene prevents microbial contamination of products. Key controls: exclusion of ill personnel from production areas, proper hand washing, grooming (clean fingernails, no heavy cosmetics), no eating/drinking in production areas. Personnel with open wounds or infectious diseases should be restricted from production until cleared. This clause includes a positive responsibility for supervisors to observe and act on health issues.

3.21 Is appropriate protective clothing required and worn to prevent contamination of intermediates and APIs?
Objective evidence
  • Gowning SOPs by area
  • Gowning diagrams showing required attire
  • Gowning training records
  • Laundry procedures for reusable gowns
  • Disposable gown stocks and use
  • Area entry requirements posted
  • Gowning observations during audits
  • Gown change frequency requirements
Common nonconformities
  • Gowning requirements not enforced
  • Same clothing worn between different areas
  • Hair/beard covering not used
  • Gowning inadequate for potent APIs
  • No training on proper gowning technique
  • Disposable garment stocks depleted without replenishment plan
Auditor tip

Protective clothing has two purposes: protecting the product from personnel contamination and protecting personnel from the process. Clothing requirements vary by area: street clothes in offices, lab coats in general production, full gowning in cleanrooms or with potent APIs. Hair covering, beard covering, gloves, and eye protection may be required. Changing frequencies must be defined — daily typical, more frequent for high-risk areas.

3.22 Are controls in place to avoid direct skin contact with exposed intermediates and APIs?
Objective evidence
  • Contact avoidance procedures
  • Glove use requirements and types
  • Sampling techniques avoiding contact
  • Closed system design documentation
  • Manual operation risk assessments
  • Training on contact avoidance
  • Glove change frequency requirements
  • Environmental controls during manual operations
Common nonconformities
  • Direct hand contact without gloves
  • Inadequate glove types for the task
  • Manual operations in uncontrolled environments
  • No training on contact avoidance
  • Gloves reused across different materials
  • Engineering controls bypassed during manual charging operations
Auditor tip

Direct skin contact with intermediates and APIs should be avoided through engineering controls (closed systems, automation) and protective equipment (gloves, sleeves, face shields). Where direct contact is unavoidable (e.g., sampling, manual charging), techniques must prevent contamination: sterile or cleaned gloves, clean sampling tools, limited exposure time, and environmental controls.

3.23 Are smoking, eating, drinking, and similar activities restricted to areas separated from production?
Objective evidence
  • Facility layout showing designated break areas
  • Signage prohibiting food/drink in production
  • Training on facility hygiene rules
  • Break area separation verified
  • Smoking cessation policy
  • Compliance observations during audits
  • Personal storage lockers outside production
  • Enforcement procedures and consequences
Common nonconformities
  • Food/drink in production areas
  • Personal medications in production
  • Break areas adjacent to production without separation
  • Smoking near production entrances
  • Rules not consistently enforced
  • Chewing gum or tobacco wrappers found in manufacturing zones
Auditor tip

Dedicated break rooms/cafeterias separated from production prevent contamination. Common controls: physical separation with doorways/airlocks, signage at entry to production, enforcement during walkthroughs, training reinforcement. Smoking is prohibited in all production areas (often the entire facility). Personal medications are prohibited to prevent accidental contamination if containers spill.

3.24 Are personnel expected to report illnesses or open lesions that could adversely affect product quality?
Objective evidence
  • Health reporting procedure
  • Anonymous reporting channels
  • Supervisor training on health recognition
  • Return-to-work medical clearance process
  • Occupational health records
  • Non-retaliation policy for reporting
  • Periodic health screening program
  • Health and safety committee records
Common nonconformities
  • No formal health reporting procedure
  • Fear of reprisal preventing reports
  • Return to work without clearance
  • Supervisors untrained in health recognition
  • No occupational health partnership
  • Seasonal illness outbreaks without temporary staffing contingency
Auditor tip

Proactive reporting of health issues prevents contamination. Personnel must feel comfortable reporting without fear of reprisal. Conditions to report: infectious diseases, gastrointestinal illness, respiratory infections, skin conditions, open wounds. Supervisors need training to recognize issues that employees may not self-report. A clear return-to-work procedure with medical clearance ensures safe return.

3.30 Are external consultants advising on GMP matters suitably qualified by education, training, and experience?
Objective evidence
  • Consultant qualifications files (CVs, certifications)
  • Written consulting agreements
  • Consultant engagement records
  • QA review of consultant qualifications
  • Scope of work documents
  • Deliverable reviews and acceptance
  • Confidentiality agreements
  • Consultant performance feedback
Common nonconformities
  • Consultants used without documented qualifications
  • No written agreements with consultants
  • Consultant advice accepted without QA review
  • Scope creep beyond qualified areas
  • No record of consultant engagements
  • Confidentiality agreements missing for external advisors
Auditor tip

External consultants are commonly used for specialized areas: regulatory strategy, validation, specialized analytical methods, facility design. Like employees, consultants must be qualified for the advice they provide. Documentation of consultant qualifications (CVs, certifications, prior engagements) should be retained. Consulting services should be governed by written agreements defining scope, deliverables, and confidentiality.

3.31 Are records kept of consultants' name, address, qualifications, and the service they provided?
Objective evidence
  • Consultant master file or database
  • Individual engagement files
  • Qualification documentation
  • Service records and deliverables
  • Retention per record retention policy
  • Accessibility during audits
  • Consultant list for QA review
  • Annual consultant usage summary
Common nonconformities
  • Consultant records scattered or missing
  • No centralized consultant information
  • Deliverables not retained as records
  • Consultants used without records
  • Records not accessible during audits
  • Retention period for consultant files shorter than GMP record requirements
Auditor tip

Consultant records create the audit trail for external advice. Content: consultant name, company, contact information, qualifications, date(s) of engagement, scope of services, deliverables produced, compensation (optional but good practice). These records should be readily available during audits to demonstrate that any external advice came from qualified sources. Retention periods should match other GMP records.

Each item shows its evidence, common nonconformities and auditor tips. The clause index has the PDF of all 350 items, formatted for a clipboard.